MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

O'Leary, Michael v. Springfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20140218)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 04-09-2014

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20140218 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by O'Leary, Michael concerning records held by Springfield, City of - Police Department, opened 04-09-2014. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20140218
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
O'Leary, Michael
Custodian
Springfield, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
04-09-2014
Date Closed
06-03-2014

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Shawn A. Williams Supervisor ofR ecords June 3, 2014 SPR14/218 Sergeant Roy Carter City of Springfield-Police Department 130 Pearl Street Springfield, MA 01105 Dear Sergeant Carter: I have received the petition of Michael O'Leary appealing the response of the City of Springfield-Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr. O'Leary on behalf of Hospitality Mutual Insurance Company, requested copies of records regarding a certain auto accident. As ofthe date of this determination and despite several attempts by members of my staff to contact you the Department has not met its burden under the Public Records Law in responding to this records request. Under the Public Records Law and the Access Regulations (Regulations) all requests for public records must be met with a response within ten (10) days of the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b); 950 C.M.R. 32.05. The response may be an offer to provide records, a fee estimate for provision of the records, or a denial. The Department is advised that all records custodians must comply with both the Public Records Law and the Regulations with respect to the timeliness of response. The ten-day provision is a maximum, rather than a minimum, time frame for complying with a public records request. The Public Records Law states that "the burden shall be upon the custodian to prove with specificity the exemption which applies." G. L. c. 66, § 10(c) (emphasis added). See also Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Comm'r, 419 Mass. 852, 857 (1995); see also District Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995). Accordingly, the Department is advised that to comply with the Public Records Law and Regulations it must provide specificity with respect to any denial of access to public records. This requires a records custodian to not only cite an exemption, but to specifically explain the applicability of the exemption to the requested records. OneAshburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 · (617) 727-2832 ·Fax (617) 727-5914 www.sec.state.ma. us/ pre

Sergeant Roy Carter SPR14/218 Page Two June 3, 2014 Accordingly, the Department is hereby ordered, within ten (10) days ofthis order, to provide Mr. O'Leary with the requested records, or provide to this office, with specificity, how a particular exemption applies to each record. If the Department is planning to charge for the cost of complying with this public records request, Mr. O'Leary must be provided with a detailed written, good faith estimate on each particular request. Once the Department receives the estimate funds, the records must be provided. Failure to comply with this administrative order may result in the filing of a complaint for enforcement in the Superior Court by Mr. O'Leary. cc: Mr. Michael O'Leary