MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Cogliano, Ronald v. Quincy, City of - City Solicitor (SPR 20140277)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 05-08-2014

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20140277 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Cogliano, Ronald concerning records held by Quincy, City of - City Solicitor, opened 05-08-2014. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20140277
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Cogliano, Ronald
Custodian
Quincy, City of - City Solicitor
Date Opened
05-08-2014
Date Closed
06-03-2014

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Shawn A. Williams Supervisor ofR ecords June 3, 2014 SPR14/277 Mr. James Timmins, Esq. City of Quincy -City Solicitor 1305 Hancock Street City Hall Third Floor Quincy, MA 02169 Dear Attorney Timmins: I have received the petition of Ronald Cogliano President of the Merit Construction Alliance appealing the response of the City of Quincy (City) to his request for public records. See G. L. c. 66 § 1O (b ); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr. Cogliano requested copies of records related to the City's Responsible Employer Ordinance. As of the date of this determination and despite at least two calls placed to you by members of my staff the City has not met its burden under the Public Records Law in responding to this records request. Under the Public Records Law and the Access Regulations (Regulations) all requests for public records must be met with a response within ten (10) days of the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b); 950 C.M.R. 32.05. The response may be an offer to provide records, a fee estimate for provision of the records, or a denial. The City is advised that all records custodians must comply with both the Public Records Law and the Regulations with respect to the timeliness of response. The ten-day provision is a maximum, rather than a minimum, time frame for complying with a public records request. The Public Records Law states that "the burden shall be upon the custodian to prove with specificity the exemption which applies." G. L. c. 66, § 10(c) (emphasis added). See also Globe Newspaper Co. v. Police Comm'r, 419 Mass. 852, 857 (1995); see also District Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995). Accordingly, the City is advised that to comply with the Public Records Law and Regulations it must provide specificity with respect to any denial of access to public records. This requires a records custodian to not only cite an exemption, but to specifically explain the applicability of the exemption to the requested records. OneAshburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 · (617) 727-2832 ·Fax (617) 727-5914 www.sec.state.ma. us/ pre

Mr. James Timmins, Esq SPR14/157 Page Two June 3, 2014 Accordingly, the City is hereby ordered, within ten (10) days ofthis order, to provide Mr. Cogliano with the requested records, or provide to this office, with specificity, how a particular exemption applies to each record. If the City is planning to charge for the cost of complying with this public records request, Mr. Cogliano must be provided with a detailed written, good faith estimate on each particular request. Once the City receives the estimate funds, the records must be provided. Failure to comply with this administrative order may result in the filing of a complaint for enforcement in the Superior Court by Mr. Cogliano. Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Ronald Cogliano