MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Maya Shaffer v. Pittsfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20160362)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 06-02-2016

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20160362 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Maya Shaffer concerning records held by Pittsfield, City of - Police Department, opened 06-02-2016. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.

Case Details

Case Number
20160362
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Maya Shaffer
Custodian
Pittsfield, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
06-02-2016
Date Closed
06-10-2016

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Shawn A. Williams Supervisor ofR ecords June 10, 2016 SPR16/362 Captain David Granger City of Pittsfield - Police Department 3 9 Allen Street Pittsfield, MA 0 120 1 Dear Captain Granger: I have received the petition of Maya Shaffer appealing the nomesponse of the City of Pittsfield-Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 § 1 O(b ); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Ms. Shaffer requested a copy of an arrest report. Having received no response, Ms. Shaffer petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); 950 C.M.R. 32.08(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); see also District Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(2) (where cost of complying with a request for public records is expected to exceed ten dollars ($10.00), custodian of records shall provide written good faith estimate). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. OneAshburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 · (617) 727-2832 ·Fax (617) 727-5914 www.sec.state.ma. us/ pre

Capt. David Granger SPR16/362 Page 2 DATE, 2016 To assist in requesting and responding to requests for public records please refer to our publication, A Guide to the Massachusetts Public Records Law. This document is available on the Internet, free of charge, at http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/prepdf/guide.pdf. Attorneys on my staff are available during regular business hours to answer general questions regarding the Public Records Law. In addition, members of my staff will visit a records custodian in person to conduct training workshops on the Public Records Law upon request. Please contact my office directly at the telephone number provided in this determination for further information. Response provided Subsequent to the intervention by a member of my staff, this office was notified by you that a response was provided, dated April22, 2016. Whereas this matter was opened based upon the Department's failure to provide a written response, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. A requester may appeal the substantive nature of custodian's response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). rs, cc: Ms. Maya Shaffer