MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Robert Cockerline v. Executive Office of Public Safety and Security - Old Colony Correctional Center (SPR 20160380)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 06-09-2016

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20160380 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Robert Cockerline concerning records held by Executive Office of Public Safety and Security - Old Colony Correctional Center, opened 06-09-2016. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20160380
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Robert Cockerline
Custodian
Executive Office of Public Safety and Security - Old Colony Correctional Center
Date Opened
06-09-2016
Date Closed
06-21-2016

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division

Shawn A. Williams Supervisor of Records

June 21, 2016 SPR16/380

Mr. Domingos DaSilva

Director of Engineering

Department of Correction - Old Colony Correctional Center One Administration Road

Bridgewater, MA 02324

Dear Mr. DaSilva:

I have received the petition of Robert Cockerline appealing the response of Old Colony Correctional Center (Correctional Center) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 § 10(b); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(2). Specifically, Mr. Cockerline requested copies of what he describes as, “shut down and repair logs pertaining to the Old Colony steam heating system”. Ina response dated March 29, 2016 you denied this request, stating the Correctional Center “is not required to supply this information.” No exemption was claimed to justify nondisclosure.

The Public Records Law

The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); 950 C.M.R. 32.08(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26).

It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); see also District Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record.

If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(a); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(2) (where cost of complying with a request for public records is expected to exceed ten dollars ($10.00), custodian of records shall

One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 - (617) 727-2832 - Fax (617) 727-5914

www.sec.state.ma.us/pre

Mr. Domingos DaSilva SPR16/380 Page 2 June 21, 2016

provide written good faith estimate). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records.

To assist in requesting and responding to requests for public records please refer to our publication, A Guide to the Massachusetts Public Records Law. This document is available on the Internet, free of charge, at http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/prepdf/guide.pdf. Attorneys on my staff are available during regular business hours to answer general questions regarding the Public Records Law. In addition, members of my staff will visit a records custodian in person to conduct training workshops on the Public Records Law upon request. Please contact my office directly at the telephone number provided in this determination for further information.

The Public Records Law does not distinguish between requesters. Access to a record requested pursuant to the Public Records Law rests on the content of the record and not the circumstances of the requester. See Bougas v. Chief of Police of Lexington, 371 Mass. 59, 64 (1976).

Order

It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). The response by the Correctional Center did not contain the specificity required in a denial of access to public records.

Accordingly, the Correctional Center is hereby ordered to provide Mr. Cockerline with a response to the request without delay, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us.

ce: Mr. Robert Cockerline