← Back to Search
Stephen Stoute v. Department of State Police - Milton Barracks (SPR 20170948)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 07-12-2017
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20170948 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Stephen Stoute concerning records held by Department of State Police - Milton Barracks, opened 07-12-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20170948
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Stephen Stoute
- Date Opened
- 07-12-2017
- Date Closed
- 07-26-2017
- Date Request Submitted
- 06-22-2017
- Response Provided Date
- 11-04-2017
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Time to Comply
- 3 months
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords July 26, 2017 SPR17/948 Sean W. Farrell, Esq. Deputy Chief Legal Counsel Massachusetts State Police 470 Worcester Road Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Attorney Farrell: I have received the petition of Stephen Stoute appealing the response ofthe Massachusetts Department of State Police-Milton Barracks (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 § 1 OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically, Mr. Stoute requested "an accident report for an accident relating to [himself] on April3. 2016." The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Sean W. Farrell, Esq. SPR17/948 Page 2 July 26, 2017 Conclusion Subsequent to the intervention by a staff member of the Public Records Division, I learned that the Department responded to Mr. Stoute's request with a response sent on November 4, 2016 and on June 29, 2017. I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Mr. Stoute may appeal the substantive nature of the Department's response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Stephen Stoute