← Back to Search
Seth Kershner v. Lawrence, City of - Fire Department (SPR 20171022)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-28-2017
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20171022 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Seth Kershner concerning records held by Lawrence, City of - Fire Department, opened 07-28-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20171022
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Seth Kershner
- Custodian
- Lawrence, City of - Fire Department
- Date Opened
- 07-28-2017
- Date Closed
- 08-11-2017
- Date Request Submitted
- 05-26-2017
- Response Provided Date
- 06-13-2017
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 11, 2017 SPR17/1022 Chief James X. Fitzpatrick Lawrence Police Department 90 Lowell Street Lawrence, MA 01842 Dear Chief Fitzpatrick: I have received the petition of Seth Kershner appealing the response of the Lawrence Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically, Mr. Kershner requested seven categories of information related to the deployment of the Emergency Response Team. Mr. Kershner received a response; however, the Department only released information relating to two categories. Mr. Kershner appealed to this office seeking the remaining five categories of information. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Chief James X. Fitzpatrick SPR17/1022 Page2 August 11, 2017 Order Despite numerous communications with the Department, no further response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is hereby ordered to provide Mr. Kershner with a response to the remainder of his request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Seth Kershner