MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Michael Dreslinski v. Clinton, Town of- Town Clerk (SPR 20171357)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-25-2017

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20171357 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Michael Dreslinski concerning records held by Clinton, Town of- Town Clerk, opened 09-25-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20171357
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Michael Dreslinski
Custodian
Clinton, Town of- Town Clerk
Date Opened
09-25-2017
Date Closed
10-10-2017
Date Request Submitted
08-27-2017
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 10, 2017 SPR17/1357 Michael J. Ward Town Administrator Clinton Town Hall 242 Church Street Clinton, MA 0151 0 Dear Mr. Ward: I have received the petition of Michael Dreslinski appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Clinton (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1 OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Dreslinski requested records identifying the dollar amount the Town was billed for legal services regarding an identified lawsuit. Having received no response, Mr. Dreslinski petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records .. One Asliburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Michael J. Ward SPR17/1357 Page2 October 10, 2017 Order Despite our letter to you acknowledging the opening of this appeal and communications with a member of my staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is hereby ordered to provide Mr. Dreslinski with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~UIT~ Supervisor of Records cc: Michael Dreslinski