MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Timothy Burke v. Boston, City of - Public Schools (SPR 20171444)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 10-10-2017

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20171444 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Timothy Burke concerning records held by Boston, City of - Public Schools, opened 10-10-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.

Case Details

Case Number
20171444
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Timothy Burke
Custodian
Boston, City of - Public Schools
Date Opened
10-10-2017
Date Closed
10-17-2017
Date Request Submitted
08-29-2017

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords October 17, 2017 SPR17!1444 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director-Records Access Officer Boston City Hall Room 615 One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Attorney Timothy Burke appealing the response of the Boston Public Schools (School) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1 OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically, Attorney Burke requested records regarding individuals attending an identified school. The School responded on September 28, 2017, however, Attorney Burke appealed stating the response was inadequate. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR17/1444 Page 2 October 17, 2017 Determination Subsequent to the intervention by a member of the Public Records Division staff, this office was notified that a supplemental response was provided, dated October 13, 2017. I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Attorney Burke may appeal the substantive nature of the School's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Timothy Burke, Esq.