MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Heather Carito v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (SPR 20171588)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Administratively closed · Filed 11-10-2017

ClosedAppealResolved

SPR 20171588 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Heather Carito concerning records held by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, opened 11-10-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Administratively closed.

Case Details

Case Number
20171588
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Heather Carito
Custodian
Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority
Date Opened
11-10-2017
Date Closed
11-17-2017
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords November 17, 2017 SPR17/1588 Julie Ciollo, Esq. Records Access Officer Assistant General Counsel Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 10 Park Plaza, Suite 7760 Boston, MA 02116 Dear Attorney Ciollo: I have received the petition of Heather Carito appealing the response of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (Authority) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ms. Carito requested copies of emails to and from an identified individual regarding a particular project. The Authority responded stating no records existed. Ms. Carito appealed stating it is her contention that responsive records do exist. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Julie Ciollo, Esq. SPRl 7/1588 Page2 November 17, 2017 Determination Subsequent to the intervention by a member of the Public Records Division staff, the Authority confirmed that there are no records responsive to Ms. Carito's request. Under the Public Records Law, the Authority is not required to create a record in response to a public records request. See G. L. c. 66, § 6A(d). The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § lO(a)(ii). Seeing that the Authority does not have a duty to create responsive records, consequently, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Sincerely, ~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Heather Carito