MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Ariel Mercado v. Worcester Regional Transit Authority (SPR 20171701)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 12-12-2017

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20171701 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Ariel Mercado concerning records held by Worcester Regional Transit Authority, opened 12-12-2017. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.

Case Details

Case Number
20171701
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Ariel Mercado
Custodian
Worcester Regional Transit Authority
Date Opened
12-12-2017
Date Closed
12-20-2017
Date Request Submitted
10-31-2017
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
7 Business Days (1-2-18)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords December 19, 2017 SPR17/1701 Jonathan Church Worcester Regional Transit Authority 60 Foster Street Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Mr. Church: I have received the petition of Ariel Mercado appealing the nomesponse of the Worcester Regional Transit Authority (WRTA) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § IOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Mercado requested records related to WRTA "incidents," investigations, and employee discipline. Having received no response, Mr. Mercado petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § IOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. To assist in requesting and responding to requests for public records please refer to our publication, A Guide to the Massachusetts Public Records Law. This document is available on One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Jonathan Church SPR17/1701 Page2 December 19, 2017 the Internet, free of charge, at http://www.sec.state.ma.us/pre/prepdf/guide.pdf. Public Records Division attorneys are available during regular business hours to answer general questions regarding the Public Records Law. In addition, Public Records Division staff will visit a records custodian in person to conduct training workshops on the Public Records Law upon request. Please contact the Public Records Division directly at the telephone number provided in this determination for further information. It is my understanding a Public Records Division staff member contacted you about this matter and you indicated the WRTA would provide a response to Mr. Mercado. Order Accordingly, the WRTA is hereby ordered to review the request made by Mr. Mercado and to provide a written response to Mr. Mercado, made in accordance with the Public Records Law, its Access Regulations and this order within ten business days. This administrative appeal is now closed. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Mercado may appeal the substantive nature of the WRTA's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Ariel Mercado