Michael Dreslinski v. Mashpee Town of - Police Department (SPR 20180460)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 04-06-2018

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20180460 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Michael Dreslinski concerning records held by Mashpee Town of - Police Department, opened 04-06-2018. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

View PDF Download PDF

Case Details

Case Number: 20180460
Case Type: Appeal
Case Subtype: Initial
Status: Closed
Requester: Michael Dreslinski
Custodian: Mashpee Town of - Police Department
Date Opened: 04-06-2018
Date Closed: 04-17-2018
Date Request Submitted: 02-19-2018
Processing Fees Charged: 0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees: No
Went to Court: No

View on official site →

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division

Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records

April 17, 2018 SPR18/460

Lieutenant Robert G. Palermo Mashpee Police Department 19 frank Kicks Drive Mashpee, MA 02649

Dear Lieutenant Palermo:

I have received the petition of Michael Dreslinski appealing the nonresponse of the Mashpee Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Dreslinski requested price quotes and purchase invoices related to the Department’s most recently purchased new, fully marked, sedan type police cruiser vehicles, Department specifications instructions provided to applicable vendors regarding all painting and lettering/decals applied to said vehicles and records identifying the font names of all said lettering/decals. Having received no response, Mr. Dreslinski petitioned this office.

Subsequent to the intervention by a member of the Public Records Division staff, this office was notified that a response was provided, dated April 10, 2018. Whereas this matter was opened based upon the Department’s failure to provide a written response, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Mr. Dreslinski may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1).

I,loroa

Lbeece. S. Murray ¢