← Back to Search
Michael Dreslinski v. Salem, City of - Police Department (SPR 20180526)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-19-2018
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20180526 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Michael Dreslinski concerning records held by Salem, City of - Police Department, opened 04-19-2018. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20180526
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Michael Dreslinski
- Custodian
- Salem, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 04-19-2018
- Date Closed
- 05-03-2018
- Date Request Submitted
- 03-11-2018
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 1 Business Day (5-3-18)
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords May 3, 2018 SPRlS/526 Sergeant Kathleen Makros Salem Police Department 95 Margin Street Salem, MA 01970 Dear Sergeant Makros: I have received the petition of Michael Dreslinski appealing the nomesponse of the Salem Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 § ·lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Dreslinski requested records regarding invoices, specifications and instructions and font names regarding a specifically identified Department vehicle. Having received no response, Mr. Dreslinski petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Sergeant Kathleen Makros SPR19/526 Page 2 May 3, 2018 Order Despite notification of the opening of this appeal and communications from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is hereby ordered to provide Mr. Dreslinski with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Michael Dreslinski