MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Collin Dias v. Fall River, City of - Office of the Corporation Counsel (SPR 20180763)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-25-2018

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20180763 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Collin Dias concerning records held by Fall River, City of - Office of the Corporation Counsel, opened 05-25-2018. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20180763
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Collin Dias
Custodian
Fall River, City of - Office of the Corporation Counsel
Date Opened
05-25-2018
Date Closed
06-11-2018
Date Request Submitted
05-04-2018
Response Provided Date
05-24-2018
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
12 Business Days (6-27-18)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords June 11, 2018 SPR18/763 Joseph I. Macy, Esq. Corporation Counsel City of Fall River One Government Center Fall River, MA 02722 Dear Attorney Macy: I have received the petition of Collin Dias appealing the response of the City of Fall River (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on May 4, 2018 Mr. Dias requested "all emails sent by Mayor Correia on any email platform to Bishop Connolly High School regarding, mentioning, or relating to me or my football Jersey." The City responded on May 24, 2018 by denying access to records. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b ), 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also District Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. The City's May 24th response indicates it would not provide further information because the requested information has no public purpose. Whereas the request references a particular event and topic, I find the City must provide a response in compliance with G. L. c. 66, § lO(b). See G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(ii)-(iv) (a written One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Joseph I. Macy, Esq. SPR18/763 Page2 June 11, 2018 response shall, where applicable, identify any public records or categories of public records sought that are not within the possession, custody, or control of the municipality, identify the agency or municipality that may be in possession, custody or control of the public record sought, if known, or identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based). I also note that Mr. Dias and the City are encouraged to maintain a professional working relationship to ensure that public records requests are clear and concise, and that records are produced efficiently and affordably. The request must reasonably describe the record being sought by including, for example, applicable time periods or topics. G. L. c. 66, § lO(a)(i). A municipality may communicate with a requestor to arrange to inspect a hard copy of the requested records at a mutually convenient time and location. Further, a municipality shall suggest a reasonable modification of the scope of the request or offer to assist the requestor to modify the scope of the request if doing so would enable the municipality to produce records sought more efficiently and affordably. See G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(vii). Conclusion Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide a response to Mr. Dias in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Collin Dias