← Back to Search
Christopher Basso v. Lowell, City of - Police Department (SPR 20181867)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 11-30-2018
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20181867 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Christopher Basso concerning records held by Lowell, City of - Police Department, opened 11-30-2018. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20181867
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Christopher Basso
- Custodian
- Lowell, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 11-30-2018
- Date Closed
- 12-12-2018
- Date Request Submitted
- 11-27-2018
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 27 Business Days (1-23-19)
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Mass,achusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S, Murray Supervisor ofR ecords December 12, 2018 SPRlS/1867 Jackie Cook Lowell Police Department 50 Arcand Drive Lowell, MA 01852 Dear Ms. Jackie Cook: I have received the petition of Christopher Basso appealing the non-response of the Lowell Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1 OA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1 OA( d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4 ). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Order Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide a response to Mr. Basso made in accordance with the Public Records Law, its Access Regulations and this order within ten business days. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Jackie Cook SPR18/1867 Page 2 December 12, 2018 pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Basso may appeal the substantive nature of the Department's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Christopher Basso