← Back to Search
Seth Kershner v. Pittsfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20181926)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 12-06-2018
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20181926 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Seth Kershner concerning records held by Pittsfield, City of - Police Department, opened 12-06-2018. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20181926
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Seth Kershner
- Date Opened
- 12-06-2018
- Date Closed
- 12-19-2018
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-17-2018
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 15 Business Days (1-11-19)
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords December 19, 2018 SPRlS/1926 Lieutenant Cary Traversa Pittsfield Police Department 3 9 Allen Street Pittsfield, MA 01201 Dear Lieutenant Traversa: I have received the petition of Seth Kershner appealing the nonresponse of the Pittsfield Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically, Mr. Kershner requested records made or received by the Department concerning an identified Response team. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing tire applicability of an exemption). To meet tire specificity 1equirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Lieutenant Gary Traversa SPR18/1926 Page 2 December 19, 2018 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal and a communication from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accorc;lingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Kershner with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Seth Kershner