MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Adam Bradley v. Lowell, City of - Law Department (SPR 20190035)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 01-07-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20190035 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Adam Bradley concerning records held by Lowell, City of - Law Department, opened 01-07-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20190035
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Adam Bradley
Custodian
Lowell, City of - Law Department
Date Opened
01-07-2019
Date Closed
01-22-2019
Date Request Submitted
12-17-2018
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
7 Business Days (1-31-19)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords January 22, 2019 SPR19/0035 John R. Hucksam, Jr., Esq. Assistant City Solicitor Lowell City Hall- Law Department 375 Merrimack Street Lowell, MA 01852 Dear Attorney Hucksam: I have received a petition from Adam Bradley appealing the nonresponse of the City of Lowell's Law Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Bradley sent a request to the Department on December 17, 2018 requesting police reports, notes and other records concerning the police department. The Public Records La1v The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A( d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4 ). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian nrnst provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

John R. Hucksam, Jr., Esq. SPR19/0035 Page 2 January 22, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Bradley with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Adam Bradley