← Back to Search
Kade Crockford v. Lynn, City of - Police Department (SPR 20190618)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 03-25-2019
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20190618 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Kade Crockford concerning records held by Lynn, City of - Police Department, opened 03-25-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20190618
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Kade Crockford
- Custodian
- Lynn, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 03-25-2019
- Date Closed
- 04-08-2019
- Date Request Submitted
- 03-07-2019
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 1 Business Days (4-9-19)
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 8, 2019 SPR19/0618 Lt. Vernon Coleman Records Access Officer City of Lynn Police Department 300 Washington St. Lynn, MA 01902 Dear Lt. Coleman: I have received the petition of Kade Crockford appealing the nonresponse of the City of Lynn Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on March 7, 2019, Ms. Crockford requested eight categories of records related to the use of facial-recognition products or services. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Lt. Vernon Coleman SPR19/0618 Page 2 April 8, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Ms. Crockford with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (I 0) business days. Said response shall be made in accordance with the Public Records Law, its Access Regulations and this order within ten business days. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Ms. Crockford may appeal the substantive nature of the Department's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Kade Crockford