MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Bruce D. Spiewakowski v. Warren, Town of (SPR 20190659)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 03-29-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20190659 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Bruce D. Spiewakowski concerning records held by Warren, Town of, opened 03-29-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20190659
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Bruce D. Spiewakowski
Custodian
Warren, Town of
Date Opened
03-29-2019
Date Closed
04-12-2019
Date Request Submitted
02-26-2019
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 12, 2019 SPR19/659 Rebecca Acerra Town of Warren 48 High Street Warren, MA 01083 Dear Ms. Acerra: I have received the petition of Bruce Spiewakowski appealing the nomesponse of the Town of Warren (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Spiewakowski requested identified emails. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Rebecca Acerra SPR19/659 Page 2 April 12, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal and a communication from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Spiewakowski with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Bruce Spiewakowski