MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Kade Crockford v. Springfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20190713)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 04-03-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20190713 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Kade Crockford concerning records held by Springfield, City of - Police Department, opened 04-03-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.

Case Details

Case Number
20190713
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Kade Crockford
Custodian
Springfield, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
04-03-2019
Date Closed
04-18-2019
Date Request Submitted
03-07-2019
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
15 Business Days (5-9-19)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 18, 2019 SPR19/0713 Andrea L. Stone Springfield Police Department 130 Pearl Street Springfield, MA 01105 Dear Ms. Andrea Stone: I have received the petition of Kade Crock.ford appealing the non-response of the Springfield.Police Department (Department) G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Order Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide a response to Kade Crock.ford made in accordance with the Public Records Law, its Access Regulations and this order within ten business days. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at · One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Andrea L. Stone SPR19/0713 Page2 April 18, 2019 pre@sec.state.ma.us. Kade Crockford may appeal the substantive nature of the Department's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~y~ Supervisor of Records cc: Kade Crockford