MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Irving F. Rounds Jr. v. Clinton, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20190746)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-10-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20190746 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Irving F. Rounds Jr. concerning records held by Clinton, Town of - Police Department, opened 04-10-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20190746
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Irving F. Rounds Jr.
Custodian
Clinton, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
04-10-2019
Date Closed
04-25-2019
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
2 Business Days (4-27-19)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords April 25, 2019 SPR19/746 Robert Champagne Town of Clinton - Police Department 176 Chestnut Street Clinton, MA O1 510 I have received the petition oflrving Rounds appealing the nomesponse of the Town of Clinton - Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Rounds requested a copy of an identified investigation. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1 O(b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. Order In an email communication from you to this office, you stated a detective advised you there are no responsive records to provide Mr. Rounds. This office sought confirmation that you advised Mr. Rounds of the same, however, no confirmation was received. Accordingly, the One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Robert Champagne SPR19/746 Page 2 April 25, 2019 Department is ordered to provide Mr. Rounds with a response clarifying whether responsive records exist, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma. us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Irving Rounds