← Back to Search
Cindy L. Christiansen, PhD v. Milton, Town of - Town Clerk (SPR 20190766)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days · Filed 04-12-2019
ClosedFee PetitionPetitioner Won
SPR 20190766 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Cindy L. Christiansen, PhD concerning records held by Milton, Town of - Town Clerk, opened 04-12-2019. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20190766
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Cindy L. Christiansen, PhD
- Custodian
- Milton, Town of - Town Clerk
- Date Opened
- 04-12-2019
- Date Closed
- 04-22-2019
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords April 22, 2019 SPR19/0766 Peter L. Mello, Esq. Town of Milton Murphy, Hesse, Toomey & Lehance, LLP Crown Colony Plaza 300 Crown Colony Drive, Suite 410 Quincy, MA 02169 Dear Attorney Mello: I have received your petition on behalf of the Town of Milton (Town) requesting permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records and a waiver of statutory limits on fees that may be assessed in responding to the requests. G. L. c. 66, § 10(c ); G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). As required by law, the Town furnished a copy of this petition to the requestor. G. L. c. 66, § lO(c). On March 28, 2019, Cindy Christiansen requested seven categories ofrecords "[fJor the time period 6/1/2018 and today, 3/28/2019" including communications between named custodians regarding herself. Petitions to assess fees The Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may approve a petition from an agency to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the agency to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d )(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve an agency's petition to allow the agency to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv). It is my determination that the request is not for a commercial purpose. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Peter L. Mello, Esq. SPR19/0766 April 22, 2019 Page 2 The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the agency to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Fee estimates A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § lO(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d )(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d )(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d )(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Petitions relating to fees must be submitted to the Supervisor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4 )(g). Conclusion The Town submitted their petition more than ten business days after receipt of the request. In light of the fact the Town has not demonstrated it submitted a timely petition, permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records cannot be granted. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Sincerely, ~ r r ~ Supervisor of Records cc: Cindy Christiansen