MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Benita Sanchez v. Board of Registration in Medicine (SPR 20190994)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 05-22-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20190994 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Benita Sanchez concerning records held by Board of Registration in Medicine, opened 05-22-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20190994
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Benita Sanchez
Custodian
Board of Registration in Medicine
Date Opened
05-22-2019
Date Closed
05-31-2019
Date Request Submitted
05-19-2019
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
5 Business Days (6-7-19)
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records May 31, 2019 SPR19/994 Tara Douglas, Esq. Assistant General Counsel Board of Registration in Medicine 200 Harvard Mill Square, Suite 330 Wakefield, MA 01880 Dear Attorney Douglas: I have received the petition of Benita Sanchez appealing the response of the Board of Registration in Medicine (Board) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ms. Sanchez requested a copy of the" ... Offer of Proof sent by the court to [the Board] pertaining to [an identified individual] in case 1984CV00119, Davis, Amanda vs. Mark, M.D., Alice." The Board responded on May 21, 2019, indicating there are no responsive records. Unsatisfied with the Board's response, Ms. Sanchez petitioned this office and this appeal, SPRl 9/994, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Tara Douglas, Esq. SPR19/994 Page2 May 31, 2019 The Board's May 21st response In its May 21, 2019 response, the Board indicates that "[t]here are currently no public documents responsive to your request. Please be advised that mandated reports maintained in the Board's Data Repository are confidential, unless otherwise required by law. See M.G.L. c. 4, § 7(26)(A); see also 243 CMR 2.13(2)." The Board explains that "[m]andate reports include, but are not limited to, closed claim reports by medical malpractice insurers, as well as court reports of medical malpractice matters. See M.G.L. c. 112, §§ 5A-5J. Therefore, to the extent that the Board possesses any responsive records described in this paragraph, they are withheld." Based on its response, although the Board indicates that "[t]here are currently no public documents responsive to [Ms. Sanchez's] request" and references the confidentiality of mandated reports, it remains unclear whether the Board possesses the "Offer of Proof ... ," and if so, how the document falls within the confidentiality provision of243 C.M.R. 2.13(2). The Board must clarify these issues. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § lO(a)(ii). Conclusion Accordingly, the Board is ordered to provide Ms. Sanchez with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within ten business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Benita Sanchez