MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Colman Herman v. Boston Police Department (SPR 20191112)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 06-04-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20191112 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Colman Herman concerning records held by Boston Police Department, opened 06-04-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20191112
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Colman Herman
Custodian
Boston Police Department
Date Opened
06-04-2019
Date Closed
06-18-2019

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords June 18, 2019 SPR19/1112 Sgt. Det. John Boyle Office of Media Relations City of Boston- Police Department One Schroeder Plaza Boston, MA 02120 Dear Sgt. Det. Boyle: I have received the petition of Colman Herman appealing the response of the City of Boston (City) Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Mr. Herman sent a request to the Department requesting "hard copies and electronic copies of any and all complaints filed with the hackney unit of BPD." The Department provided a response to Mr. Herman on May 6, 2019. In an email on June 4, 2019, Mr. Herman appealed the Department's response to this office. Appeal Under the Public Records Law and the Access Regulations (Regulations) all requests for public records must be met with a response within ten business days of receipt of the request. G. L. c. 66, § lO(a)-(b). The response may contain, among other things, an offer to provide records, a fee estimate for provision of the records, or a denial. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b ). All records custodians must comply with both the Public Records Law and the Regulations with respect to the timeliness of response. The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a )(ii), (b )(ii). Also, the duty to comply with requests for records extends to identifying the agency or municipality that may be in possession, custody, or control of the public record sought, if known. See G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iii). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(iv) ( written response must "identify any records, categories of records or portions of records that the agency or municipality intends to withhold, and provide the specific reasons for such withholding, including the specific exemption or exemptions upon which the withholding is based ... "); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507,511 (1995) (custodian has the One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Sgt. Det. John Boyle SPR19/1112 Pg. 2 June 18, 2019 burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). The City's Records Access Officer, Attorney Shawn Williams, sent an email on June 5, 2019 in response to Mr. Herman's request stating he is "actively working with BPD" and intends to provide a response. Attorney Williams also provided a response in an email on June 11, 2019 adding "[t]oday I spoke with the Hackney Unit Office Manager. I intend to meet with the Office Manager and other members of the Hackney Unit staff next week. At that time I expect to obtain answers to all of Colman's questions and also find out when the 2018 records will be able to be pulled, reviewed and provided. I will provide Colman with a detailed written response at that time." It is unclear if the Department possesses records responsive to Mr. Herman's request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10( a)(ii), (b )(ii), (iii). Specifically, the Department must explain whether the requested records existed and were destroyed, or whether the records did not initially exist. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a )(ii), (b )(ii). If such records were destroyed, the Department must demonstrate whether it followed proper records retention protocol. Conclusion Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Herman with a response provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Colman Herman