← Back to Search
Eric Brown v. Chelmsford, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20191481)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 07-24-2019
ClosedFee PetitionDecision
SPR 20191481 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Eric Brown concerning records held by Chelmsford, Town of - Police Department, opened 07-24-2019. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20191481
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Eric Brown
- Date Opened
- 07-24-2019
- Date Closed
- 07-31-2019
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records July31,2019 SPR19/1481 Kathleen Bennett Chelmsford Police Department 2 Olde North Road Chelmsford, 01824 Dear Ms. Bennett: I have received your petition on behalf of the Chelmsford Police Department (Depaitment) seeking to charge $25 per hour in responding to a request made by Attorney Eric R. Brown of the Law Offices of Eric R. Brown. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). As required by law, a municipality must furnish a copy of their petition to the requestor. Id. It is my understanding that Attorney Brown has received a copy of your petition in this matter. Attorney Brown is requesting: • All Motor Vehicle Accident repmis for Chelmsford, Massachusetts from July 8th 2019 through July 14th 2019; . • All Motor Vehicle Accident reports for Chelmsford, Massachusetts from July 15, 2019 through July 21st, 2019. Petitions to assess fees The Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § IO(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality's petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Kathleen Bennett SPR19/1481 Page 2 July 29th, 2019 first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Current Petition In your July 24, 2019 petition, you provided this office with Attorney Brown's request and the "adve1iisements he sends out to involved pmiies in motor vehicle accidents." In the July 24th letter, you expressed that, "[t]he Law Office of Eric Brown is requesting reports on a weekly basis for a commercial purpose." The term "commercial purpose" as used in this section shall mean: the sale or resale of any p01iion of the public record or the use of information from the public record to advance the requester's strategic business interests in a manner that the requester can reasonably expect to make a profit, and shall not include gathering or reporting news or gathering information to promote citizen oversight or fmiher the understanding of the operation or activities of government or for academic, scientific, journalistic or public research or education. G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(ix). Based on the Department's July 24th petition and the correspondence provided, it is my understanding that the requests made by the Law Offices ofE ric R. Brown meet the statutory definition of "commercial purpose" within the Public Records Law. See G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(ix); see also SPR18/13 l 8 Determination of the Supervisor of Records (September 5, 2018). However, municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. See G. L. c. 66, § IO(d)(iii). Please be advised, the Supervisor does not possess the authority to permit municipalities with populations of 20,000 people or more to charge for the first two hours of employee time to respond to a request for public records. if:w_ f1tULu,W Rebecca S. Murr~; .... ·-... ~ Supervisor of Records cc: Eric R. Brown, Esq.