← Back to Search
Eric Salamon v. Quincy, City of - Office of the City Clerk (SPR 20191663)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-15-2019
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20191663 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Eric Salamon concerning records held by Quincy, City of - Office of the City Clerk, opened 08-15-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20191663
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Eric Salamon
- Date Opened
- 08-15-2019
- Date Closed
- 08-27-2019
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 27, 2019 SPR19/1663 Nicole L. Crispo City of Quincy Office of the City Clerk 1305 Hancock Street, 211 d Floor Quincy, MA 02169 Dear Ms. Crispo: I have received the petition of Eric Salamon appealing the nonresponse of the City of Quincy (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Salamon requested records regarding the City's facilitation of a new distribution center. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashbmion Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Nicole L. Crispo SPR19/1663 Page 2 August 27, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal and communications with a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Salamon with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~u~ Supervisor of Records cc: Eric Salamon