← Back to Search
Vahan Hanedanian v. Watertown, City of - Police Department (SPR 20191778)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 08-30-2019
ClosedFee PetitionPetitioner Won
SPR 20191778 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Vahan Hanedanian concerning records held by Watertown, City of - Police Department, opened 08-30-2019. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20191778
- Case Type
- Fee Petition
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Vahan Hanedanian
- Date Opened
- 08-30-2019
- Date Closed
- 09-09-2019
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords September 9, 2019 SPR19/1778 Catalina Gonzalez Records Clerk Watertown Police Department 552 Main Street Watertown, MA 024 72 Dear Ms. Gonzalez: I have received your petition on behalf of the Watertown Police Department (Department) seeking to charge $108.10 in responding to a request made by Vahan Hanedanian. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). As required by law, the Department furnished a copy of their petition to the requestor. Id. On July 26, 2019, Mr. Hanedanian requested records within the possession of the Department, though it is unclear how many, and which specific record(s) had been requested. Petitions to assess fees The Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) may approve a petition from a municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting or to charge in excess of $25 per hour, if the Supervisor determines that 1) the request is for a commercial purpose or 2) the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the agency to comply with the request. G. L. c. 66, § · lO(d)(iv). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality's petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or redacting records or to charge in excess of $25 an hour for the provision of public records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(iv). It is my determination that the request is not for a commercial purpose. The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Catalina Gonzalez SPR19/1778 Page 2 September 9, 2019 segregation or fee in excess of $25 per hour; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Fee Estimates A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10( d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § lO(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Petitions relating to fees must be submitted to the Supervisor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06( 4)(g). Conclusion Subsequent to a conversation with a staff member of the Public Records Division, I learned that Mr. Hanedanian has agreed to pay the Department's estimated fee. As such, I find it unnecessary to opine on the Department's petition. The requestor may appeal the substantive nature of the Depanntent's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Vahan Hanedanian