MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Cindy Chen v. Executive Office for Administration & Finance (SPR 20192332)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 11-19-2019

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20192332 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Cindy Chen concerning records held by Executive Office for Administration & Finance, opened 11-19-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20192332
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Cindy Chen
Custodian
Executive Office for Administration & Finance
Date Opened
11-19-2019
Date Closed
12-04-2019
Date Request Submitted
10-15-2019
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Time to Comply
10 Business Days

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records December 4, 2019 SPR19/2332 Michael Heffernan Executive Office for Administration and Finance State House, Room 373 Boston, MA 02133 Dear Mr. Heffernan: I have received the petition of Cindy Chen appealing the nonresponse of the Executive Office for Administration and Finance (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1 ). Specifically, Ms. Chen requested records relating to identified individuals and the Hinton and Amherst drug labs. Having received no response, she petitioned this office. Tlte Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507,511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 · sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

Michael Heffernan SPR19/2332 Page 2 December 4, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Ms. Chen with a· response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, ~.~ Supervisor of Records cc: Cindy Chen