← Back to Search
Michael P. Dreslinski v. Everett, City of - Police Department (SPR 20192345)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 11-20-2019
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20192345 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Michael P. Dreslinski concerning records held by Everett, City of - Police Department, opened 11-20-2019. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20192345
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Michael P. Dreslinski
- Custodian
- Everett, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 11-20-2019
- Date Closed
- 12-05-2019
- Date Request Submitted
- 10-11-2019
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records December 5, 2019 SPR19/2345 Sgt. Mark Zielinski Everett Police Department 45 Elm Street Everett, MA 02149 Dear Sgt. Zielinski: I have received the petition of Michael Dreslinski appealing the nonresponse of the Everett Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 1O A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Dreslinsld requested all communications to and from WFXT 25 related to an identified news story. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. Tlte Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c~ 66, § 1O A( d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4 ). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § lO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. · If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b )(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us Sgt. Zielinski SPR19/2345 Page 2 December 5, 2019 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Dreslinski with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, · · ~ Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Michael Dreslinski