← Back to Search
Christopher Pereira v. Bristol County Sheriff's Office (SPR 20200231)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 02-07-2020
ClosedAppealDecision
SPR 20200231 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Christopher Pereira concerning records held by Bristol County Sheriff's Office, opened 02-07-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20200231
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Christopher Pereira
- Custodian
- Bristol County Sheriff's Office
- Date Opened
- 02-07-2020
- Date Closed
- 02-24-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 01-20-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S, Murray Supervisor of Records February 24, 2020 SPR20/0231 Lorraine J. Rousseau, Esq. Bristol County Sheriff's Office 400 Faunce Corner Road North Dartmouth, MA 02747 Dear Attorney Rousseau: I have received the petition of Christopher Pereira appealing the nonresponse of the Bristol County Sheriffs Office (Office) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Pereira requested an identified case file. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records, G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.LR. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass, 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 * (617) 727-2832 Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec,state.ma.us/pre * pre@sec.state.ma.us Lorraine J. Rousseau, Esq. SPR20/0231 Page 2 February 24, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. | Accordingly, the Office is ordered to provide Mr. Pereira with a response to the request, in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Lbotea Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Christopher Pereira