MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

David Young v. Pioneer Valley Regional School District (SPR 20200412)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 02-27-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20200412 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by David Young concerning records held by Pioneer Valley Regional School District, opened 02-27-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.

Case Details

Case Number
20200412
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
David Young
Custodian
Pioneer Valley Regional School District
Date Opened
02-27-2020
Date Closed
02-28-2020
Date Request Submitted
02-06-2020
Response Provided Date
02-27-2020
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
NA
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords February 28, 2020 SPR20/0412 Joanne Wallace Administrative Assistant to the Superintendent Pioneer Valley Regional School District 97 F. Sumner Turner Road Northfield, MA 01360 Dear Joanne Wallace: I have received the petition of David Young appealing the non-response of the Pioneer Valley Regional School District (District) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § IOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on February 6, 2020, Mr. Young requested four categories of records concerning the District. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § IO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507,511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. Conclusion Subsequent to the intervention by a staff member of the Public Records Division, I learned that the District provided Mr. Young records responsive to his request. In light of the provision of records, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre• pre@sec.state.ma.us

SPR20/0412 Joanne Wallace Page 2 February 28, 2020 Mr. Young may appeal the substantive nature of the District's response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, ~a~ Supervisor of Records cc: David Young