← Back to Search
Christopher Burrell v. Northwestern District Attorney's Office (SPR 20200514)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Administratively closed · Filed 03-24-2020
ClosedAppealResolved
SPR 20200514 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Christopher Burrell concerning records held by Northwestern District Attorney's Office, opened 03-24-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Administratively closed.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20200514
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Christopher Burrell
- Date Opened
- 03-24-2020
- Date Closed
- 03-24-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 02-26-2020
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division · Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor ofR ecords March 24, 2020 SPR20/0514 Cynthia Von Flatern, Esq. Assistant District Attorney Northwestern District Attorney's Office One Gleason Plaza Northampton, MA 01060 Dear Attorney Von Flatern: I have received the petition of Christopher Burrell of WGBH appealing the response of the Northwestern District Attorney's Office (DAO) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Burrell requested: • " .... documents that show your office's policy for handling requests for certification of federal 1-918, Supplement B forms (issued by U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services • How many requests from individuals seeking assistance with 1-918, Supplement B forms did the Northwestern District Attorney's Office receive in each of the last eight years, dating back to Jan. 1, 2012? • Of these requests, how many of these federal forms did your office sign or certify in each year? • Does your office have an authorized or designated staff member who certifies these forms?" The DAO responded to Mr. Burrell on March 4, 2020, providing a response to some of Mr. Burrell's requests and indicating that it does not possess responsive information to others. Unsatisfied with this response, Mr. Burrell petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR 20/0514, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § lOA(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). "Public records" is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Cynthia Von Flatern, Esq. SPR20/0514 Page 2 March 24, 2020 form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § IO(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. Current Appeal The DAO responded to Mr. Burrell on March 4, 2020, providing a response to requests 1 and 4. With respect to requests 2 and 3, the DAO states that it "does not keep statistics on the number and the disposition of requests received." No Duty to Create Records Please be advised, under the Public Records Law a custodian is not required to create a record in response to a public records request. See G. L. c. 66, §6A(d ). In addition, a public employee is not required to answer questions, or do research, or create documents in response to questions. See 32 Op. Atty Gen. 157, 165 (May 18, 1977). The duty to comply with requests for records extends to those records that exist and are in the possession, custody, or control of the custodian of records at the time of the request. See G. L. c. 66, § 10(a )(ii). · Whereas the DAO has informed Mr. Burrell that it does not possess the requested information, I find it has met its burden in responding to this request. Conclusion Accordingly, I will consider this appeal closed. If Mr. Burrell is not satisfied with the resolution of this administrative appeal, please be advised that this office shares jurisdiction with the Superior Court of the Commonwealth. See G. L. c. 66, § 1O (b) (pursuing administrative appeal does not limit availability of applicable judicial remedies). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Christopher Burrell