← Back to Search
Bobby Ahearn v. Marshfield, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20200549)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 03-17-2020
ClosedAppealDecision
SPR 20200549 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Bobby Ahearn concerning records held by Marshfield, Town of - Police Department, opened 03-17-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20200549
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Bobby Ahearn
- Date Opened
- 03-17-2020
- Date Closed
- 03-31-2020
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 1 Business Day
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records March 31, 2020 SPR20/0549 Phillip Tavares Marshfield Police Department 1639 Ocean Street Marshfield, MA 02050 Dear Chief Tavares: I have received the petition of Bobby Ahearn appealing the nonresponse of the Marshfield Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, in an email dated March 17, 2020, Mr. Ahearn requested various investigative materials related to a recent traffic stop. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) ( custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Phillip Tavares SPR20/0549 Page 2 March 31, 2020 Conclusion At this time it is my understanding that the Department has not provided Mr. Ahearn a response to his request for records. Accordingly, the Department is to provide Mr. Ahearn with a response to the request in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations, as soon as practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Bobby Ahearn