MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Craig Swinson v. Richmond School District (SPR 20200608)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Public records appeal decision · Filed 03-30-2020

ClosedAppealDecision

SPR 20200608 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Craig Swinson concerning records held by Richmond School District, opened 03-30-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Public records appeal decision.

Case Details

Case Number
20200608
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Craig Swinson
Custodian
Richmond School District
Date Opened
03-30-2020
Date Closed
04-13-2020
Date Request Submitted
03-04-2020
Time to Comply
N/A

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 13, 2020 SPR20/608 Peter Dillon Richmond School District 1831 State Road Richmond, MA 01254 Dear Mr. Dillon: I have received the petition of Craig Swinson appealing the nonresponse of the Richmond School District (District) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Swinson requested records regarding a chemical/oil spill. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Peter Dillon SPR20/608 Page 2 April 13, 2020 Conclusion Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the District is to provide Mr. Swinson with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations as soon as practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Craig Swinson