MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Emiliano Falcon-Morano v. Braintree, Town of - Police Department (SPR 20200625)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 04-01-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20200625 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Emiliano Falcon-Morano concerning records held by Braintree, Town of - Police Department, opened 04-01-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20200625
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Emiliano Falcon-Morano
Custodian
Braintree, Town of - Police Department
Date Opened
04-01-2020
Date Closed
04-15-2020
Date Request Submitted
02-14-2020
Time to Comply
1 Business Day

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records April 15, 2020 SPR20/625 Nicole Taub, Esq. Braintree Police Department 282 Union Street Braintree, MA 02185 Dear Attorney Taub: I have received the petition of Emiliano Falcon appealing the nonresponse of the Braintree Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Falcon requested records pertaining to “Clearview AI.” Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Nicole Taub, Esq. SPR20/625 Page 2 April 15, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Falcon with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations as soon as practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Emiliano Falcon