← Back to Search
Craig P. Shibley v. Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth - Administrative Services Division (SPR 20200841)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency must provide records · Filed 05-26-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20200841 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Craig P. Shibley concerning records held by Office of the Secretary of the Commonwealth - Administrative Services Division, opened 05-26-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency must provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20200841
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Craig P. Shibley
- Date Opened
- 05-26-2020
- Date Closed
- 06-09-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 05-08-2020
- Response Provided Date
- 05-26-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records June 9, 2020 SPR20/0841 Valerie Connolly Records Access Officer One Ashburton Place Boston, MA 02108 Dear Ms. Connolly: I have received the petition of Craig P. Shibley appealing the nonresponse of the Administrative Services Division (Division) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Shibley requested identified communications. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. It is my understanding that responsive records have been provided. Accordingly, I will consider this appeal closed. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Valerie Connolly SPR20/0841 Page 2 June 9, 2020 Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Craig P. Shibley