MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

John Saia v. Malden, City of (SPR 20201088)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 07-06-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20201088 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by John Saia concerning records held by Malden, City of, opened 07-06-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20201088
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
John Saia
Custodian
Malden, City of
Date Opened
07-06-2020
Date Closed
07-17-2020
Date Request Submitted
06-19-2020

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records July 17, 2020 SPR20/1088 Kathleen Manning Hall City of Malden 110 Pleasant Street, 3rd Fl. Malden, MA 02148 Dear Ms. Manning-Hall: I have received the petition of John Saia appealing the nonresponse of the City of Malden (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66 § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Saia requested records pertaining to “Unite Malden 2020” and records of payments made by the City for restorative justice services. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kathleen Manning-Hall SPR20/1088 Page 2 July 17, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Mr. Saia with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations as soon as practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: John Saia