← Back to Search
Stevan Johnson v. Boston, City of - Law Department (SPR 20201204)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 07-17-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201204 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Stevan Johnson concerning records held by Boston, City of - Law Department, opened 07-17-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201204
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Stevan Johnson
- Custodian
- Boston, City of - Law Department
- Date Opened
- 07-17-2020
- Date Closed
- 07-31-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-02-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records July 31, 2020 SPR20/1204 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Stevan Johnson appealing the nonresponse of the City of Boston Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Johnson requested several records within the Department’s possession. Claiming to have not yet received a response, he petitioned this office and this appeal, SPR20/1204, was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR20/1204 Page 2 July 31, 2020 Current Appeal In a July 6th response, the Department explains that they are unsure of what records Mr. Johnson is seeking. The Department further asks that Mr. Johnson clarify his request with their office. I encourage the parties to communicate to determine which records Mr. Johnson is seeking. The Department is to provide Mr. Johnson with a response to the request, in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations as soon as is practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. The requestor may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Stevan Johnson