← Back to Search
Benjamin Douglas v. Lynn, City of - Public Schools (SPR 20201249)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 07-27-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201249 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Benjamin Douglas concerning records held by Lynn, City of - Public Schools, opened 07-27-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201249
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Benjamin Douglas
- Custodian
- Lynn, City of - Public Schools
- Date Opened
- 07-27-2020
- Date Closed
- 07-29-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-05-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records July 29, 2020 SPR20/1249 Charles N. Gallo, J.D. Compliance Officer Lynn Public Schools 100 Bennett Street Lynn, MA 01905 Dear Attorney Gallo: I have received the petition of Ben Douglas appealing the nonresponse of the Lynn Public Schools (School) to request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Ben Douglas submitted a request for the “Lynn School Administrators Collective Bargaining Agreement.” Claiming to not yet have received a response, Ben Douglas petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Charles N. Gallo SPR20/1249 Page 2 July 29, 2020 Order Subsequent to the intervention by a member of the Public Records Division, this office was notified that a response was provided, dated July 6, 2020. Whereas this matter was opened based upon the School’s lack of a written response, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Ben Douglas may appeal the substantive nature of the School’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Ben Douglas