← Back to Search
Stevan Johnson v. Boston, City of - Law Department (SPR 20201309)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond · Filed 08-05-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201309 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Stevan Johnson concerning records held by Boston, City of - Law Department, opened 08-05-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to respond.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201309
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Stevan Johnson
- Custodian
- Boston, City of - Law Department
- Date Opened
- 08-05-2020
- Date Closed
- 08-06-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-11-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 6, 2020 SPR20/1309 Shawn A. Williams, Esq. Director of Public Records Records Access Officer City of Boston One City Hall Square Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Stevan Johnson appealing the nonresponse of the Treasury Department of the City of Boston (Department) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Johnson submitted a request for certain checks. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Johnson petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4 § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Shawn A. Williams, Esq. SPR20/1309 Page 2 August 6, 2020 Order Subsequent to the intervention by a staff member of the Public Records Division, this office was notified that a response was provided, dated August 5, 2020. Whereas this matter was opened based upon the Department’s lack of a written response, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed Mr. Johnson may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within ninety days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Stevan Johnson