← Back to Search
Maya Shaffer v. Chicopee, City of - Police Department (SPR 20201362)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-12-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201362 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Maya Shaffer concerning records held by Chicopee, City of - Police Department, opened 08-12-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201362
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Maya Shaffer
- Date Opened
- 08-12-2020
- Date Closed
- 08-26-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-27-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 26, 2020 SPR20/1362 Marshall T. Moriarty, Esq. Records Access Officer City of Chicopee 17 Springfield Street Chicopee, MA 01013 Dear Attorney Moriarty: I have received the petition of Maya Shaffer of Critical MA News appealing the nonresponse of the City of Chicopee (City) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Ms. Shaffer requested several records in the City’s possession. Having received no response, she petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Marshall Moriarty, Esq. SPR20/1362 Page 2 August 26, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the City is ordered to provide Ms. Shaffer with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations as soon as is practicable. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Maya Shaffer