← Back to Search
Colman Herman v. Boston, City of - Law Department (SPR 20201364)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Administratively closed · Filed 08-12-2020
ClosedAppealResolved
SPR 20201364 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Colman Herman concerning records held by Boston, City of - Law Department, opened 08-12-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Administratively closed.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201364
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Colman Herman
- Custodian
- Boston, City of - Law Department
- Date Opened
- 08-12-2020
- Date Closed
- 08-25-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records August 25, 2020 SPR20/1364 Shawn Williams, Esq. Boston Law Department 1 City Hall Square, Room 615 Boston, MA 02201 Dear Attorney Williams: I have received the petition of Colman Herman appealing the nonresponse of the Boston Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Herman requested several categories of records within the possession of the Department. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Herman petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Shawn Williams, Esq. SPR20/1364 Page 2 August 25, 2020 Conclusion Subsequent to the request for an appeal, I learned that the Department responded to Mr. Herman’s request with a response sent on August 20, 2020. Whereas the basis of this appeal was opened as a result of the Department’s failure to provide a written response, I will now consider this administrative appeal closed. Mr. Herman petitioned this office appealing the substantive nature of the Department’s response. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). The substantive nature of the response will be reviewed in SPR20/1455. Accordingly, I will consider this appeal closed. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Colman Herman