← Back to Search
Harvey B. Heafitz, Esq. v. Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (SPR 20201515)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-28-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201515 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Harvey B. Heafitz, Esq. concerning records held by Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, opened 08-28-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201515
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Harvey B. Heafitz, Esq.
- Date Opened
- 08-28-2020
- Date Closed
- 09-10-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 07-29-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 10, 2020 SPR20/1515 Julie A. Ciollo, Esq. Records Access Officer Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority 10 Park Plaza, Suite 7760 Boston, MA 02116 Dear Attorney Ciollo: I have received the petition of Attorney Harvey B. Heafitz appealing the nonresponse of the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (Authority) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on July 29, 2020, Attorney Heafitz requested several records pertaining to a contract agreement between the Authority and JF White Contracting Company. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Attorney Heafitz petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Julie A. Ciollo, Esq. SPR20/1515 Page 2 September 10, 2020 If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. In an email dated August 31st, the Authority stated that a response will be provided to Attorney Heafitz “within 10 business days,” but as of this date has not provided a response to his request for records. Order Accordingly, the Authority is ordered to provide Attorney Heafitz with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations without delay. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Attorney Heafitz may appeal the substantive nature of the Authority’s response within ninety (90) days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Attorney Harvey B. Heafitz