← Back to Search
Brian Keaney v. Dedham Town Admin (SPR 20201551)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 08-26-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201551 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Brian Keaney concerning records held by Dedham Town Admin, opened 08-26-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201551
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Brian Keaney
- Custodian
- Dedham Town Admin
- Date Opened
- 08-26-2020
- Date Closed
- 09-03-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 3, 2020 SPR20/1551 William Keegan Town of Dedham Town Administrator 22 Bryant Street Dedham, MA 02026 Dear Mr. Keegan: I have received the petition of Mr. Brian Keaney appealing the nonresponse of the Town of Dedham Town Administrator (Town) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Keaney submitted a request for “any invoices or checks cut showing how much money was spent on [a certain] investigation” within the possession of the Town. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Keaney petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507,511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us William Keegan SPR20/1551 Page 2 September 3, 2020 Conclusion Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Keaney with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Brian Keaney