← Back to Search
Tom Stalker v. New Marlborough, Town of - Town Clerk (SPR 20201642)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-10-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201642 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Tom Stalker concerning records held by New Marlborough, Town of - Town Clerk, opened 09-10-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201642
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Tom Stalker
- Date Opened
- 09-10-2020
- Date Closed
- 09-24-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 08-14-2020
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 24, 2020 SPR20/1642 Katherine Chretien Public Records Officer 807 Mill River Southfield Road Mill River, MA 01244 Dear Katherine Chretien: I have received the petition of Tom Stalker appealing the nonresponse of the Town of New Marlborough (Town) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, on August 14, 2020, Mr. Stalker requested, “[a]ll correspondence received and sent by [an identified individual] related to any business on behalf of the Finance Committee and the Cable Advisory Committee for the period beginning on July 1, 2020 and ending on August 15, 2020.” The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. As of the date of this letter, it is my understanding that the Town has not provided Mr. Stalker a response to his request for records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Katherine Chretien SPR20/1642 Page 2 September 24, 2020 Order Accordingly, the Town is ordered to provide Mr. Stalker with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Tom Stalker