MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Jordan Rich v. Springfield, City of - Police Department (SPR 20201743)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-18-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20201743 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Jordan Rich concerning records held by Springfield, City of - Police Department, opened 09-18-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20201743
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Jordan Rich
Custodian
Springfield, City of - Police Department
Date Opened
09-18-2020
Date Closed
10-01-2020
Date Request Submitted
08-31-2020
Processing Fees Charged
0.00
Petitions Regarding Fees
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 1, 2020 SPR20/1743 Ms. Andrea Stone City of Springfield Police Department 130 Pearl Street Springfield, MA 01105 Dear Ms. Stone: I have received the petition of Mr. Jordan Rich appealing the nonresponse of the City of Springfield Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Rich submitted a request for the SMVR for an identified vehicle within the possession of the Department. Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. Rich petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Ms. Andrea Stone SPR20/1743 Page 2 October 1, 2020 Conclusion Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Rich with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Jordan Rich