MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Susan Petroni v. Framingham, City of (SPR 20201745)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days · Filed 09-18-2020

ClosedFee PetitionPetitioner Won

SPR 20201745 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Susan Petroni concerning records held by Framingham, City of, opened 09-18-2020. Type: Fee Petition. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to comply within 10 days.

Case Details

Case Number
20201745
Case Type
Fee Petition
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Susan Petroni
Custodian
Framingham, City of
Date Opened
09-18-2020
Date Closed
09-24-2020

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records September 24, 2020 SPR20/1745 Todd Palmer Super RAO Mayor's Office Department City of Framingham 150 Concord St. Framingham, MA 01702 Dear Mr. Palmer: I have received your petition on behalf of the City of Framingham (City) requesting permission to charge for time spent segregating or redacting responsive records under G. L. 66, § 10(d)(iv). Please be advised, the law requires custodians to furnish a copy of any petition to the requestor. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). On September 9, 2020, Susan Petroni, on behalf of SOURCE Media, requested “emails from ANY city email address to MEMA, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Mass DCR, Mass EOPS, and Mass DEP, or the Governor's office, and also the legislative delegation between August 1 and September 9.” Subsequent to the opening of this petition, Ms. Petroni submitted two responses to this office related to the City’s petition. Petition to Assess Fees A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records (Supervisor) under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10 (d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). In rendering such a decision, the Supervisor is required to consider the following: a) the public interest served by limiting the cost of public access to the records; b) the financial ability of the requestor to pay the additional or increased fees; and c) any other relevant extenuating circumstances. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). The statute sets out a two-prong test for determining whether the Supervisor may approve a municipality’s petition to allow the municipality to charge for time spent segregating or One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Todd Palmer SPR20/1745 Page 2 September 24, 2020 redacting records. The first prong is whether the request for records was made for a commercial purpose. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). It is my determination that this request was not made for a commercial purpose. The second prong of the test is whether the fee represents an actual and good faith representation by the municipality to comply with the request. The Supervisor must consider 1) if the fee is necessary such that the request could not have been prudently completed without the redaction or segregation; 2) the amount of the fee is reasonable; and 3) the fee is not designed to limit, deter or prevent access to requested public records. Id. Petitions seeking a waiver of statutory limits to fees assessed to segregate and/or redact public records must be made within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Fee Estimates A municipality may assess a reasonable fee for the production of a public record except those records that are freely available for public inspection. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d). The fees must reflect the actual cost of complying with a particular request. Id. A maximum fee of five cents ($.05) per page may be assessed for a black and white single or double-sided photocopy of a public record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(i). Municipalities may not assess a fee for the first two hours of employee time to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce the record or records requested unless the municipality has 20,000 people or less. G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii). Where appropriate, municipalities may include as part of the fee an hourly rate equal to or less than the hourly rate attributed to the lowest paid employee who has the necessary skill required to search for, compile, segregate, redact or reproduce a record requested, but the fee shall not be more than $25 per hour. Id. However, municipalities may charge more than $25 per hour if such rate is approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). A fee shall not be assessed for time spent segregating or redacting records unless such segregation or redaction is required by law or approved by the Supervisor of Records under a petition under G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iv). See G. L. c. 66, § 10(d)(iii); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4). Petitions relating to fees must be submitted to the Supervisor within ten business days after receipt of a request for public records. 950 C.M.R. 32.06(4)(g). Current Petition On September 23, 2020, the City emailed this office stating “[p]lease withdraw this request.”

Todd Palmer SPR20/1745 Page 3 September 24, 2020 Conclusion Accordingly, I find in light of the City’s September 23rd email, it is unnecessary to opine on the City’s petition at this time. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Susan Petroni