← Back to Search
Joe Difazio v. Quincy, City of - Police Department (SPR 20201765)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-22-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20201765 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Joe Difazio concerning records held by Quincy, City of - Police Department, opened 09-22-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20201765
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- Joe Difazio
- Custodian
- Quincy, City of - Police Department
- Date Opened
- 09-22-2020
- Date Closed
- 10-06-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 08-30-2020
- Time to Comply
- 0 Business Days
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 6, 2020 SPR20/1765 Lt. Terence McDonnell City of Quincy Police Department 1 Sea Street Quincy, MA 02169 Dear Lt. McDonnell: I have received the petition of Mr. Joe DiFazio appealing the nonresponse of the City of Quincy Police Department (Department) to his request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. DiFazio submitted a request for “any and all reports, investigations, notes, findings, communications electronic or otherwise and any other investigative materials related to a crash in Randolph on August 25th where a Randolph police officer hit a pedestrian. This includes any communications back and forth with the Randolph Police Department.” Claiming to not yet have received a response, Mr. DiFazio petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Lt. Terence McDonnell SPR20/1765 Page 2 October 6, 2020 Conclusion Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. DiFazio with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law, and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Mr. Joe DiFazio