MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Gabriel Schmitt v. UMASS Amherst (SPR 20201780)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 09-23-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20201780 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Gabriel Schmitt concerning records held by UMASS Amherst, opened 09-23-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20201780
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Gabriel Schmitt
Custodian
UMASS Amherst
Date Opened
09-23-2020
Date Closed
10-06-2020
Date Request Submitted
09-01-2020
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
0 Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 6, 2020 SPR20/1780 Christine M. Wilda Associate Chancellor for Compliance University of Massachusetts – Amherst 181 President’s Drive Amherst, MA 01003 Dear Ms. Wilda: I have received the petition of Gabriel Schmitt appealing the nonresponse of the University of Massachusetts – Amherst (University) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Mr. Schmitt requested several records in the University’s possession. Having received no response, he petitioned this office and this appeal was opened as a result. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Christine M. Wilda SPR20/1780 Page 2 October 6, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal from a member of the Public Records Division staff, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the University is ordered to provide Mr. Schmitt with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Gabriel Schmitt