MA Public Records Search
← Back to Search

Seth Kershner v. Department of Correction - Legal Division (SPR 20201963)

Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-13-2020

ClosedAppealPetitioner Won

SPR 20201963 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by Seth Kershner concerning records held by Department of Correction - Legal Division, opened 10-13-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.

Case Details

Case Number
20201963
Case Type
Appeal
Case Subtype
Initial
Status
Closed
Requester
Seth Kershner
Custodian
Department of Correction - Legal Division
Date Opened
10-13-2020
Date Closed
10-27-2020
Date Request Submitted
08-09-2020
Petitions Regarding Fees
No
Time to Comply
Ten (10) Business Days
Went to Court
No

PDF Document

Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records October 27, 2020 SPR20/1963 Kate M. Silvia Department of Correction Legal Division 70 Franklin Street, Suite 600 Boston, MA 02110-1327 Dear Ms. Silvia: I have received the petition of Seth Kershner appealing the nonresponse of the Department of Correction (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Kershner requested “completed copies of standards compliance audits, from Jan. 2016 until the date of this request, for five county correctional institutions in the state.” Having received no response, Mr. Kershner petitioned our office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us

Kate Silvia SPR20/1963 Page 2 October 27, 2020 Order Subsequent to the opening of this appeal, the Department indicated that it has compiled the records and intends to provide a response. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Kershner with said response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within 10 business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Mr. Kershner may appeal the substantive nature of the Department’s response within 90 days. See 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: Seth Kershner