← Back to Search
John E. Stote v. Worcester, City of - Police Department (SPR 20202099)
Massachusetts Public Records Appeal · Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records · Filed 10-28-2020
ClosedAppealPetitioner Won
SPR 20202099 is a Massachusetts Public Records Law appeal filed by John E. Stote concerning records held by Worcester, City of - Police Department, opened 10-28-2020. Type: Appeal. Status: Closed. Supervisor of Public Records determination: Petitioner won — agency ordered to provide records.
Case Details
- Case Number
- 20202099
- Case Type
- Appeal
- Case Subtype
- Initial
- Status
- Closed
- Requester
- John E. Stote
- Date Opened
- 10-28-2020
- Date Closed
- 11-06-2020
- Date Request Submitted
- 10-07-2020
- Response Provided Date
- 11-23-2020
- Processing Fees Charged
- 0.00
- Petitions Regarding Fees
- No
- Time to Comply
- 10 Business Days
- Went to Court
- No
PDF Document
Extracted Text (searchable & copyable)
The Commonwealth of Massachusetts William Francis Galvin, Secretary of the Commonwealth Public Records Division Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records November 6, 2020 SPR20/2099 Lieutenant Stanley Roy Worcester Police Department 911 Lincoln Street Worcester, MA 01608 Dear Lieutenant Roy: I have received the petition of John Stote appealing the nonresponse of the Worcester Police Department (Department) to a request for public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A; see also 950 C.M.R. 32.08(1). Specifically, Mr. Stote requested a copy of the Department’s Special Operating Procedures concerning the custom, practice and procedures of how the Department operates when policing, testifying before a grand jury and testifying at trial. Having received no response, he petitioned this office. The Public Records Law The Public Records Law strongly favors disclosure by creating a presumption that all governmental records are public records. G. L. c. 66, § 10A(d); 950 C.M.R. 32.03(4). “Public records” is broadly defined to include all documentary materials or data, regardless of physical form or characteristics, made or received by any officer or employee of any town of the Commonwealth, unless falling within a statutory exemption. G. L. c. 4, § 7(26). It is the burden of the records custodian to demonstrate the application of an exemption in order to withhold a requested record. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(iv); 950 C.M.R. 32.06(3); see also Dist. Attorney for the Norfolk Dist. v. Flatley, 419 Mass. 507, 511 (1995) (custodian has the burden of establishing the applicability of an exemption). To meet the specificity requirement a custodian must not only cite an exemption, but must also state why the exemption applies to the withheld or redacted portion of the responsive record. If there are any fees associated with a response a written, good faith estimate must be provided. G. L. c. 66, § 10(b)(viii); see also 950 C.M.R. 32.07(2). Once fees are paid, a records custodian must provide the responsive records. One Ashburton Place, Room 1719, Boston, Massachusetts 02108 • (617) 727-2832• Fax: (617) 727-5914 sec.state.ma.us/pre • pre@sec.state.ma.us Lieutenant Stanley Roy SPR20/2099 Page 2 November 6, 2020 Order Despite being notified of the opening of this appeal, no response has been provided. Accordingly, the Department is ordered to provide Mr. Stote with a response to the request, provided in a manner consistent with this order, the Public Records Law and its Regulations within ten (10) business days. A copy of any such response must be provided to this office. It is preferable to send an electronic copy of this response to this office at pre@sec.state.ma.us. Sincerely, Rebecca S. Murray Supervisor of Records cc: John Stote